- To: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] Audit: push audit success and retcode into arch ptrace.h
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 00:36:44 +0200
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx, monstr@xxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx, heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx, linux390@xxxxxxxxxx, lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, oleg@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, user-mode-linux-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20110603220451.23134.47368.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <20110603220451.23134.47368.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; )
Am Samstag 04 Juni 2011, 00:04:51 schrieb Eric Paris:
> The audit system previously expected arches calling to audit_syscall_exit
> to supply as arguments if the syscall was a success and what the return
> code was. Audit also provides a helper AUDITSC_RESULT which was supposed
> to simplify things by converting from negative retcodes to an audit
> internal magic value stating success or failure. This helper was wrong
> and could indicate that a valid pointer returned to userspace was a failed
> syscall. The fix is to fix the layering foolishness. We now pass
> audit_syscall_exit a struct pt_reg and it in turns calls back into arch
> code to collect the return value and to determine if the syscall was a
> success or failure. We also define a generic is_syscall_success() macro
> which determines success/failure based on if the value is < -MAX_ERRNO.
> This works for arches like x86 which do not use a separate mechanism to
> indicate syscall failure.
>
> In arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_64.c I see that we were using regs[9] in the old
> audit code as the return value. But the ptrace_64.h code defined the macro
> regs_return_value() as regs[3]. I have no idea which one is correct, but
> this patch now uses the regs_return_value() function, so it now uses
> regs[3].
>
> We make both the is_syscall_success() and regs_return_value() static
> inlines instead of macros. The reason is because the audit function must
> take a void* for the regs. (uml calls theirs struct uml_pt_regs instead
> of just struct pt_regs so audit_syscall_exit can't take a struct pt_regs).
> Since the audit function takes a void* we need to use static inlines to
> cast it back to the arch correct structure to dereference it.
>
> The other major change is that on some arches, like ia64, we change
> regs_return_value() to give us the negative value on syscall failure. The
> only other user of this macro, kretprobe_example.c, won't notice and it
> makes the value signed consistently for the audit functions across all
> archs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> [for x86 portion]
The UML part is now fine for me. :-)
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux Hams]