RE: [PATCH 2/2]Add Variable Page Size and IA64 Support in Intel IOMMU: IA64 Specific Part

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 17:53 -0700, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> >Architecturally, I'm surprised that ia64 would need to actually do a
> >cache flush.  I would think the VT-d hardware would do coherent
> accesses which would make the cache flush unnecessary.
> 
> VT-d hardware supports both non cache coherency and cache coherency by
> bit Coherency in Extended Capabilities Register.

But is the version without the cache coherency actually going to be
_seen_ on IA64?

> Could you please point me to the doc that explicitly says that
> architecturally ia64 doesn't need cache flush?

For safety, we can always make the driver just refuse to initialise on
IA64 if the cache coherency bit isn't set.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html