RE: [patch 2/4] ia64 use trace hook | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
> I think this patch meets this requirement. The 2.6.27 version of > tracehook_report_syscall_entry() always returns 0 ... so the error > code paths are untested. I don't really follow the ia64 asm. But looks OK to me, assuming that int return values are sign-extended in the register (I think syscall functions always return long instead). It's true that there is no handy way to test that yet. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux MIPS Home] [Kernel List] [Sparc Linux] [DCCP] [Linux ARM List] [Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Architecture] [Linux SCSI] [Linux x86_64] [Linux Hams] [Site Home]
![]() |