Re: [RFC PATCH] set TASK_TRACED before arch_ptrace code to fix a race | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
The another mysterious that I completely don't understand probably needs your help. Why kernels with utrace patch applied on ia64 just work? Sounds like utrace delivers an extra SIGTRAP comparing with kernel without utrace code.. Dose it make sense? Hmm.. Sounds like a bug to me.. On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So is there or is there not any regression (change) in the kernel's behavior? > > If you are now just talking about strace's own code, then the place for > that is strace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, not any kernel lists. > > > Thanks, > Roland > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux MIPS Home] [Kernel List] [Sparc Linux] [DCCP] [Linux ARM List] [Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Architecture] [Linux SCSI] [Linux x86_64] [Linux Hams] [Site Home]
![]() |