Google
  Web www.spinics.net

RE: [BUG?][2.6.25-mm1] sleeping during IRQ disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


>   1185         br.cond.sptk.many .work_processed_kernel        // re-check
>   1186 
>   1187 .notify:
>   1188 (pUStk) br.call.spnt.many rp=notify_resume_user
>
> on line 1188 we call notify_resume_user() with interrupts disabled (at
> least if we fall through from the code above ... I didn't check the
> state of interrupts if we branch to ".notify").

Oops ... that's a br.cond on 1185 (not a br.call) ... so there is
no fall through to .notify.  So we do have to trace backwards and
check on the state of interrupts for the places that branch to the
.notify label ... someone is doing so with interrupts masked.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Linux MIPS Home]     [Kernel List]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM List]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Architecture]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]     [Site Home]

  Powered by Linux