Re: [PATCH 1/2] HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK

[Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:45:32PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 20:11 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Change all the #ifdef TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK conditionals in non-arch
> > code to #ifdef HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK.
> 
> That ifdef was only supposed to be a temporary thing until all
> architectures had implemented TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK anyway.
> 
> It looks like only ARM, v850 and m68k which are still missing it; if
> those three architectures can catch up, then hopefully it can die off
> completely quite soon.

Well, we don't have the pselect/ppoll/epoll_wait syscalls and there's
been no demand for them, so I don't particularly see the point of
going to the trouble of adding support for something no one's
interested in using.

I was going to suggest defining TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK to zero to eliminate
some of the code (and the ifdefs), but unfortunately its a bit position
not a bitmask so that won't work.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html