Re: [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Linus Torvalds writes: > Of course, it may well not be worth it. Unlike the TIF flags, the TS flags > have been architecture-specific and I don't think all architectures even > do them (x86 uses them for FP state bits and stuff like that). Powerpc has a "local_flags" field. I don't mind changing it if we are going to have a consistent name across architectures, but "status" (as x86 uses) seems a bit nondescript to me. Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux MIPS Home] [Kernel List] [Sparc Linux] [DCCP] [Linux ARM List] [Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Architecture] [Linux SCSI] [Linux x86_64] [Linux Hams] [Site Home]
|