Re: [PATCH] i2c: Split I2C_M_NOSTART support out of I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:36:17PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > This is all correct, but it should be documented in > Documentation/i2c/i2c-protocol. At the moment documentation still says > that I2C_M_NOSTART is a weird protocol quirk nobody should be using. > When you update the documentation, I think it is important to stress > that there are now two use cases of I2C_M_NOSTART. If direction > changes, it is a rarely needed protocol quirk. If direction doesn't > change, it is used for buffer gathering. Hrm, actually rereading the documentation it wasn't all that clear that these were particularly disrecommended - it just mentioned that the flags existed and might be needed. I strengthened the documentation here as well.
Description: Digital signature