Re: [PATCH] i2c: Split I2C_M_NOSTART support out of I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Also, I'd think the FUNC_NOSTART bit should be 0x08 and SMBUS_PEC 0x4000. This > will be more intuitive, probably? What is the value in renumbering everything? It just seems like it makes the diff less clear and has no practical value.
Description: Digital signature