Re: [patch v3 21/36] Hexagon: Add SMP support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:51:52AM -0300, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> And on the producer side, a spinlock for one or... that looks like wheel
> re-inventing to me :-)
> In fact your bit iteration loop also re-invents find_*_bit interfaces.
> Any reason why you don't simply use bitops or atomics here ?

No particular reason; just the way it turned out when I was getting things
working.  I'll get them cleaned up.

> Also what is your memory model ? ordered or weakly ordered ? Do you need
> some kind of memory barrier between setting ipi->bits and
> __vmintop_post() ?

Our model is ordered, so there's no need for a barrier there yet.

Richard Kuo


Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hexagon" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Powered by Linux