Re: Node.js and it's future in debian

[Patrick Ouellette <pouelle@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:17:08PM +0300, Marius Petrescu wrote:
> 
> Now I really subscribe di David's arguments but I would add something else.
> 
> Node.js is a server-side JavaScript environment, so the "js" is a
> legitimate, even useful addition.
> Node on the other hand is exactly what its name states: a communication
> node.
> axnode is not correct since it also supports pure tcp/ip, netrom and rose
> (and virtual any other protocol which allows a character oriented p2p link).
> 
> So why get the javascript out of a java script environment and put a
> restrictive title to a communication node tool?
> And by the way, most know node.js as node.js, so the confusion will be even
> greater if you change the name.

I certainly agree with your comments.  The confusion can arise because
Node.js is the project's name, node is one of the names of a binary in the
Node.js package.

Pat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html