On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 03:51:57PM +0200, Bernard Pidoux wrote:
> I am actually concerned by two remaining bugs in ROSE module :
> First, is the occurence of negative values for neighbour->use parameter
> from time to time.
In the past week I noticed various ROSE bugs including non-atomic
manipulation of variables which may explain this and other issues. Some
may be hard to trigger but ROSE (and probably AX.25 and NETROM) are still
quite full of bugs.
> Second, is the impossibility to remove rose module after an application such
> as FPAC has initialized rose nodes and routes.
I never noticed that one - I tend to build my AX.25 test kernels with all
protocols and drivers built in most of the time.
Certain other kernel modules - IPv4 and IPv6 come to mind - cannot be
unloaded either. It was deemed to much work for too little gain to make
that work. I'm not sure if ROSE belongs into that group? Probably not.
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Newbie]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Memory]
[Git]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Linux Admin]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[ARM Linux Kernel]
[Linux Networking]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]