Re: netstat caused a SIGSEGV

["Bernard, f6bvp" <f6bvp@xxxxxxx>]

Message resent (previous post were rejected for it contained HTML code).

With my previous ROSE patch a segment violation would occur when
rose->state was at a higher level than ROSE_STATE_3.
This was due to an error in rose_state[] array lacking all possible ROSE
states.
The present patch corrects this bug by initializing rose_state[]
correctly according to linux/include/net/rose.h

--- net-tools/netstat.c 2010-08-16 13:47:50.000000000 +0200
+++ net-tools/netstat.c 2010-08-16 13:29:11.000000000 +0200
@@ -504,10 +505,12 @@
#if HAVE_AFROSE
static const char *rose_state[] =
{
- N_("LISTENING"),
- N_("CONN SENT"),
- N_("DISC SENT"),
- N_("ESTABLISHED")
+ N_("READY"),
+ N_("AWAITING CALL ACCEPTED"),
+ N_("AWAITING CLEAR CONFIRMATION"),
+ N_("CONNECTED"),
+ N_("AWAITING RESET CONFIRMATION"),
+ N_("AWAITING CALL ACCEPTANCE")
};

static int rose_info(void)



I updated previous ROSE patch against 1.70 netstat Berlios CVS here :

http://f6bvp.free.fr/logiciels/netstat/net-tools-rose-1.70.diff
http://f6bvp.free.fr/logiciels/netstat/net-tools-netstat-1.70.diff


73 de Bernard, f6bvp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html