|
|
|
Re: Ubuntu 8.04 / 8.10 | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Ray Wells wrote:
Peter,This problem arose with fbb around kernel 2.6.20 (can't remember just which one now)The fix I apply is to compile fbb with -fno-stack-protection added to its Makefile. I don't have a fix if you install fbb from a deb package.It seems that stack protection was included in kernels as a security plug for stack overflow.I sent quite a bit about this to the xfbb list around 18 months ago.
The real question (to me at least) is whether the stack-smash abort is a false alarm, or whether it indicates a real problem in the FBB software. If there really is a way in which the FBB software is managing to smash its own stack (via e.g. a buffer that's too small, indexing out of bounds, etc.), then simply disabling the stack protection feature via recompilation is a bit like replacing a blown fuse with a larger one. You may get away with it, or it may burn your house down :-( It'd probably be necessary to compile xfbb with -g and run it under GDB or a similar debugger, and investigate the state of the stack at the time of the abort, to figure out what's being over-written. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Site Home] [Linux Newbie] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Git] [Security] [Netfilter] [Linux Admin] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [Linux Networking] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]
![]() |
![]() |