Re: [PATCH] Wrong list_lock argument in rose_node seqops

[David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Bernard Pidoux <bpidoux@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:08:56 +0200

> In rose_node_start() as well as in rose_node_stop()
> __acquires() and spin_lock_bh() were wrongly passing
> rose_neigh_list_lock instead of rose_node_list_lock arguments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied, good catch.

Thanks Bernard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html