|
|
|
Re: What were the reasons of having IP address at AX.25 interfaces ? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:50:48PM +0100, Ralf Baechle DL5RB wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:04:17PM +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote: > > Can anybody remember, why AX.25 interfaces in Linux kernel are > > enforced to have IP addresses by tools such as KISSATTACH ? > > A while ago I was curious myself for why that is needed and dug into > the CVS history. I found the IP address wasn't always enforced and the > commit message didn't really explain why the change was needed. > > 73 de DL5RB op Ralf I figured it eventually myself, and rewrote libax25's axconfig/rsconfig/nrconfig functions to not to require IP addresses in AX.25/Netrom/Rose interfaces to be able to find all interface currently defined. > --- > DL5RB / M0LRB / AB1IN > Loc. JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21 > Packet: DL5RB@DB0FHN.#BAY.DEU.EU 73 de Matti, OH2MQK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Site Home] [Linux Newbie] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Netfilter] [Linux Admin] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [Linux Networking] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]
![]() |