Re: What were the reasons of having IP address at AX.25 interfaces ? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 06:39:19PM +0000, Glenn Wright wrote: > For the HAMS like me that run TCP/IP. Sure, but that does not mean that _all_ interfaces must have IP address. In my specific present application scope the question is APRS -- those radio channels do not run IP at all, and therefore forcing the interfaces to have IP is superflous at best. > Matti Aarnio wrote: > > I can well understand that the IP address is OPTIONAL, but > > not that it is MANDATORY. Thus the question: is there a reason to have the IP address as MANDATORY parameter for things like kissattach ? Related: at present there are no ready-made init-scripts for AX.25/ROSE/etc. Or perhaps I just have failed to spot any in any Debian variations, or RedHat/SuSE... Something like what there exists for IP settings. 73 de Matti, OH2MQK - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Site Home] [Linux Newbie] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Netfilter] [Linux Admin] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [Linux Networking] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]
![]() |