Re: Some packet questions... | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On 10/31/06 12:29 PM, "Bob Nielsen" <nielsen@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2006, at 12:03 PM, IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USN wrote: > >> On 10/31/06 4:50 AM, "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Nothing has really changed in many years, so the documentation >>> hasn't had >>> any reason to be revised. >>> >>> I found my local IP address coordinator very helpful in getting IP >>> over >>> AX.25 running. >> >> I have been given so many stories concerning IP address >> coordination that I >> got fed up with even trying to coordinate! First I was assigned a >> 32 address >> block in the Philly area, then I was told in California that it >> would not be >> workable. Why not? If this is truly an IP network, why would I need >> to have >> a new set of IP address when only the physical location changed? >> > > The subnets are assigned by state and locality. Philadelphia is part > of 44.080/16 and Beverly Hills is part of 44.016/16. It's probably How did you determine which areas were part of what subnets? How do I locate the appropriate coordinator for each area in order to assert a proper application? > more of a routing issue than anything else. This stuff is handled > differently in different locations (some route by subnets; others do > not). Is there a way to find out if a particular area is in fact routed or not, and if not, what I need to do if I want to provide a way to route it for that particular area (using a VPN tunnel over the Internet)? What steps must I take to apply for a group of (say 32) addresses for the Beverly Hills, Las Vegas, or Philly/DC area? > >> I am still interested now to find out what my current IP assignment >> is, and >> as well what the 32 address range is I was given. >> > > I don't see n3gwg anywhere in the ampr.org list <ftp://ftp.ucsd.edu/ > hamradio/ampr.org>. I noticed that I was conspicuously missing as well after a quick review post your commentary. I used to have an allocation, but it seems apparently evaporated. > > 73 - Bob, N7XY > Bainbridge Island, WA > -- Very Respectfully, IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USN Beverly Hills, California Amateur Radio Call Sign: N3GWG (Extra) email: teners@xxxxxxxxxxx phone: +(1) 310.358.0202 (Beverly Hills, CA) phone: +(1) 215.338.6005 (Philadelphia, PA) E-Fax: +(1) 915.773.0935 (Telecopier) Military emails (checked monthly until remote NMCI access is secured) NIPRNET: stuart.tener@xxxxxxxx / tenerstu@xxxxxxx / stuart.tener@xxxxxxx SIPRNET: NONE TS/SCI: cntensb@xxxxxxxxxx (JWICS) / tenerstu@xxxxxxxxxx (GWAN) TS/SCI: cntensb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Stone Ghost, TS//SI/REL AUS/CAN/GBR/USA) One must like the horse to ride. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Site Home] [Linux Newbie] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Netfilter] [Linux Admin] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [Linux Networking] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]
![]() |