Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
(4/4/12 9:43 AM), Ulrich Drepper wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:38, KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:As far as I understand, any major open source project don't use posix_spawn(). Please remind, I'm talking about real world issue.This doesn't mean they shouldn't. If you require code to be changed anyway let them change to something which doesn't require more cruft in the kernel. The limitations you cited are irrelevant for posix_spawn. And perhaps there will be actually spawn support in the kernel which would make dealing with OOM situations and non-overcommit much easier.
Umm... I'm sorry. I haven't catch why OOM is related topic. Could you please elaborate more? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Filesystem]