|
|
|
Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2) | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On 04/01/2012 12:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 01 April 2012, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 + >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + >> fs/Makefile | 1 + >> fs/nextfd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 + >> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+) > > I don't have any comments on the syscall itself, but when you add one, please > also make the change to include/asm-generic/unistd.h so it appears in the > various architectures using the generic syscall table. > > Arnd Arnd: do you have any interest in leveraging the syscall scripts I did for x86? I have tried to make them as generic as possible, with the hope of getting more and more of syscall information into more easily processed form. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Filesystem]
![]() |