Re: [PATCH 0/7] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If the implementation is slow or buggy then the appropriate action is
> to speed it up and to fix the bugs, so these are just non-arguments,
> IMO.


"userspace filesystem"?

The problem is right there. Always has been. People who think that
userspace filesystems are realistic for anything but toys are just

fuse works fine if the thing being exported is some random low-use
interface to a fundamentally slow device. But for something like your
root filesystem? Nope. Not going to happen.

So Andrew, I think that arguing that something _can_ be done with
fuse, and thus _should_ be done with fuse is just ridiculous. That's
like saying you should do a microkernel - it may sound nice on paper,
but it's a damn stupid idea for people who care more about some idea
than they care about reality.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at


[Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Ecryptfs]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Filesystem]

  Powered by Linux