Re: container disk quota
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On 06/03/2012 09:47 AM, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
On Jun 3, 2012, at 08:23 , Jeff Liu wrote:Hi Kirill, On 06/02/2012 11:21 PM, Kirill Korotaev wrote:Not having looked closely at the original patchset, let me ask - is this feature going to be a freebie with Eric's usernamespace patches?It we can reach a consensus to bind quota on mount namespace for container or other things maybe.1. OpenVZ doesn't use mount namespaces and still has quotas per container.AFAICS, OpenVZ has self-released quota tools to supply this feature.but standard quota tools work inside container w/o any modifications. This is very important for us, cause we run unmodified distros inside.Yes, am agree. I can work out a new patches regarding quota tools based on mount namespace w/o any modification.Jeff, why do you need fs namespace for quotas? OpenVZ works w/o it. It sounds as too strict use case limitation. Or do I understand your patchset description wrong?
OpenVZ has its own kernel, with its very own isolation capabilities. So in upstream, something has to be used instead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Reiser Filesystem Development] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]