Re: possible bridge regression in "bridge: implement [add/del]_slave ops"? |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Thursday 30 June 2011 19:08:19 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:33:23 +0200
>
> Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > * echo $(pgrep rstpd) > /var/run/rstpd.pid
> > * brctl addbr br1
> > * echo 1 > /sys/class/net/br1/bridge/stp_state
>
> This bogus. You are running both kernel and spanning
> tree daemon at the same time!
>
> Doing the echo of 1 to stp_state forces kernel spanning
> tree. You want 2 which is what is supposed to be use for user
> mode spanning tree.
Well, at first sight you're right. But looking at the code at
br_stp_set_enabled() in br_stp_if.c it doesn't matter which value you echo
into stp_state, it just have to be non-zero
The detection of usermode oder kernelmode STP is done using the usermode
helper (see br_stp_start). I tried echoing 1, 2 or even 5 into stp_state, with
a working /sbin/bridge-stp I get 2 from stp_state each time.
Maybe it is valuable to change this odd behavior.
Regards,
Alexander
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
[Netdev]
[AoE Tools]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]