Re: [PATCH 1/2] Issue NETDEV_CHANGE notification when bridge changes state

[Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 02:03:28 -0600
Adam Majer <adamm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 10:43:03PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Why not set forwarding delay to zero? I don't think you are using STP?
> > 
> > P.s: removing linux-kernel mailing list, since there is no point
> > in copying the whole world on this thread.
> 
> I just sent patches where MAINTAINERS file told me to send it. ;)
> 
> No, I'm not relying on STP. I think setting learning->forwarding delay
> to 0 could cause problems with STP like loops until the loop is
> detected.
> 
> There may be a better spot where to insert the notification that the
> bridge is forwarding data, though I'm not exactly certain where. The
> patch will cause bridge to issue NETDEV_CHANGE notification for all
> topology changes. This may or may not be useful but shouldn't be
> harmful (I can't imagine these occur very often?) The IPv6 autoconf
> patch will only act on this if it doesn't have IPv6 address configured
> manually or via autoconf.
> 

Since this a generic problem, it needs a better solution.
Sending NETDEV_CHANGE impacts lots of other pieces, and even
user space has similar problems.

-- 
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge