Re: Bridge between switch and router + VLAN issue |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:46:31 +0530
krunal patel <krunal.raj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is one setup i am not able to complete.
>
> I am putting bridge between a VLAN aware switch and a router with VLAN's.
>
> All hosts are behind VLAN switch and their gateway is router.
> All works well when there are no VLANs.
>
> br0
> |--------eth0
> |--------eth1
>
> When VLAN tags are added and passed to bridge, for forwarded traffic
> it works well.
>
> Now, if i want to do transparent proxy i have to create vlan devices
> for eth0, eth1 and add them to bridge
>
> br0
> |--------eth0
> |--------eth1
> |--------eth0.2
> |--------eth1.2
>
> Problem here is, on one side of bridge router is there which gives
> same mac for different tagged and untagged traffic. So bridge only
> learns one mac. So some tagged frame entered into bridge and if we do
> transparent proxy on it. Frames generated by proxy to router goes
> untagged or with different tag.
> To do proxy and handle vlan tag i have to add vlan interfaces into
> same bridge but vlan tags are not same.
This isn't going to work because it creates a loop. eth0 sees
both tagged and untagged frames and eth0.2 sees tagged frames
In recent kernels vlan 0 is supposed to work as way to manage
untagged frames. Maybe using:
br0
|--------eth0.0
|--------eth1.0
|--------eth0.2
|--------eth1.2
--
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
[Netdev]
[AoE Tools]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]