Re: Handling of modular boards

[Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>]

Dear Arnd,

In message <201205042039.25794.arnd@xxxxxxxx> you wrote:
>
> > On the other hand, some of the issues we're trying to solve here
> > for the kernel are also present in the boot loader, so this needs to
> > do this anyway - whether by inserting new or modifying (enabling or
> > disabling) existing properties in the DT is not really relevant here.
> 
> I haven't seen a case where the add-on board is actually required
> for booting. What examples are you thinking of?

There are systems (and I bet it will be a growing number) where U-Boot
itself uses the DT for configuration.  Also, there are functions that
are needed both by the boot loader and the kernel - for example to
dislay a splash screen the boot loader needs to initialize the
display, so it must be able to detect which type of LCD is attached
(resolution, color-depth, orientation) - the device tree comes in very
handy here.  Why should Linux re-do all such things?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@xxxxxxx
I must follow the people.  Am I not their leader? - Benjamin Disraeli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html