- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: drop Execute-In-Place
- From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:05:12 +0200
- Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-embedded <linux-embedded@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>, Eric Miao <eric.miao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1105051518580.24613@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just to be clear... We have XIP in the tree already. If it is useful
> to someone, in-tree or out-of-tree, then it is worth keeping around.
> Even if the only user was out-of-tree which certainly wasn't the case
> when I added XIP support to the kernel, then ripping it out and adding
> it back later would be more trouble than preserving it.
>
> What I was asking recently is whether or not XIP is still useful to
> someone today. Apparently it is, which is the answer I was looking for.
Surely it is. The last thing I tried was the i.mx deviation which is
very much based on what's in the tree. It didn't work out without some
bits of hackery and I never got it straight enough to try upstreaming.
But nevertheless, IMO XIP is not dead and is not going to be in the
closest future.
~Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux MMC Devel]
[U-Boot V2]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]