Re: [PATCH RFC v2 00/35] Second preview of imx-drm cleanup series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:37:26PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> I'd like all of them to go through, too. If you don't want to have the DT
> changes integrated, I'd appreciate if you could have a  look at my
> patches on top of your series and possibly append them to your
> series or let me synchronize somehow:
> 
> http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20140106.145159.a1d82ba9.en.html

I replied to your 2nd patch there...

I'm not happy ending up with a hard dependency between v4l2 code and
code needed for the display side to work, especially when we can end
up with imx-drm being the primary console display.  I've outlined my
thoughts about what I think needs to happen in the reply to patch 2.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux