Re: [PATCH 2/6] ramoops: Move to fs/pstore/ram.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:17:51AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
> > @@ -585,15 +585,6 @@ config DEVPORT
> >  
> >  source "drivers/s390/char/Kconfig"
> >  
> > -config RAMOOPS
> > -	tristate "Log panic/oops to a RAM buffer"
> > -	depends on HAS_IOMEM
> > -	depends on PSTORE
> This "depends on PSTORE" line is not in my staging-next tree, where did
> it come from?

The thing is that ramoops switched to pstore just recently, and the
patch is in -mm tree.

(Just for the record, I use linux-next-20120504, HEAD at commit

> I'm guessing that because of this, is why the other conflict happens,
> right?


> Any ideas on what I can do to resolve it?  As you are moving a file, I
> want to make sure I move the correct version of it :)

There's a cross-tree dependency with -mm tree, as it appears.

So, I'm not sure which is better:

1. Push the whole pile of patches via -mm; or

2. You apply the two patches from -mm tree before my series:
   	"ramoops: use pstore interface"
   	linux-next commit 60aad9fc1f04ca19e800c5984ad84f405d133a11
   	"ramoops: fix printk format warnings"
   	linux-next commit f2a28afdb529c43a7eb21fd0c991cab5676ef011 seem to not respond at the
   moment, so I guess the easiest way to grab the patches would
   be to cherry-pick the two commits above from the linux-next
   repository. That way Andrew would automatically drop them
   from his tree.


Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
devel mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux