Re: [PATCH 3.0.y 0/4] Re: lirc_serial spuriously claims assigned port and irq to be in use

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 02:17:09PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:39:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> 
> >>>> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be
> >>>> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from
> >>>> kernel.org?
> >>>
> >>> Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except
> >>> 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate.
> >>
> >> Great.  Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y,
> [...]
> > So they should also go to 3.2-stable, right?
> 
> Yes.

Thanks, all now queued up.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel