Re: [PATCH 3.0.y 0/4] Re: lirc_serial spuriously claims assigned port and irq to be in use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:04:07PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:39:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > 
> > >> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be
> > >> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from
> > >> kernel.org?
> > >
> > > Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except
> > > 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate.
> > 
> > Great.  Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, in
> > the hope that some interested person can confirm they still work.  The
> > only backporting needed was to adjust to the lack of
> > drivers/staging/lirc -> drivers/staging/media/lirc renaming.
> 
> So they should also go to 3.2-stable, right?
 
Yes, only for 3.2 a simple cherry-pick should work.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
                                                              - Albert Camus
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Video for Linux]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Free Singles Community]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Devices]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux