Re: [PATCH 3.0.y 0/4] Re: lirc_serial spuriously claims assigned port and irq to be in use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:39:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> 
> >> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be
> >> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from
> >> kernel.org?
> >
> > Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except
> > 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate.
> 
> Great.  Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, in
> the hope that some interested person can confirm they still work.  The
> only backporting needed was to adjust to the lack of
> drivers/staging/lirc -> drivers/staging/media/lirc renaming.

I'll look at these, but please, in the future, send all stable patches
to stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as there are other stable trees that people
maintain and they watch that list...

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Video for Linux]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Free Singles Community]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Devices]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux