Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: lirc_serial: Fix init/exit order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[...]
> From <http://bugs.debian.org/645811> I see that you tested these patches:
> 
>  affc9a0d59ac [media] staging: lirc_serial: Do not assume error codes
>               returned by request_irq()
>  9b98d6067971 [media] staging: lirc_serial: Fix bogus error codes
>  1ff1d88e8629 [media] staging: lirc_serial: Fix deadlock on resume failure
>  c8e57e1b766c [media] staging: lirc_serial: Free resources on failure
>               paths of lirc_serial_probe()
>  9105b8b20041 [media] staging: lirc_serial: Fix init/exit order
> 
> in a VM.  They were applied in 3.3-rc1 and have been in the Debian
> kernel since 3.1.4-1 at the end of November.
> 
> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be
> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from
> kernel.org?

Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except
9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Video for Linux]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Free Singles Community]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Devices]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux