> Trying a dynamic memory allocation, and fallback on a single
> pre-allocated bloc of memory, shared by all cpus, protected by a
> spinlock
...
> -
> + static u64 msg_schedule[80];
> + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(msg_schedule_lock);
> int i;
> - u64 *W = get_cpu_var(msg_schedule);
> + u64 *W = kzalloc(sizeof(msg_schedule), GFP_ATOMIC |
__GFP_NOWARN);
>
> +
> + if (!W) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&msg_schedule_lock);
> + W = msg_schedule;
> + }
If this code can be called from an ISR is the kmalloc()
call safe?
If the above is safe, wouldn't it be better to:
1) try to use the static buffer
2) try to kalloc() a buffer
3) spinwait for the static buffer to be free
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Kernel]
[Gnu Classpath]
[Gnu Crypto]
[DM Crypt]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]