Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization

[dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx>]

one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the 
family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could 
you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results?

also -- please drop the #define for R16 to %rsp ... it obfuscates more 
than it helps anything.

thanks
-dean

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:

> * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]:
> 
> >Hi, Sebastian,
> Hi Huang,
> 
> sorry for the delay.
> 
> >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of
> >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches
> >is attached with the mail.
> The new results are attached.
> 
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >Huang Ying
> 
> Sebastian
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html