Re: Cachefs fails to take effect on nfs4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Oh look.
v4 80dc463e  801 0:25    c8654208da0d3669  yes
v4 80dc463e  801 0:29    c2802708a327444c  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:30    f2ea2e083af0fe63  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:31    fc84f3087ee0f5bf  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:32    2c93ab08436f99a3  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:33    7705f508a0321794  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:34    66cd2408d4c8e437  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:35    6b2ff4087fbd4ca5  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:36    a61fa708d6ad9c18  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:37    13a3430891f06e40  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:38    7d4f1708dda50f42  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:39    89767d08afa027c6  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:40    3ee4fb08decc40f3  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:41    94dd44086a2b296d  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:42    5f82f3080c8068ce  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:43    b3fc77085d29f08a  no
v4 80dc463e  801 0:44    7835e708d7da44b9  no
[...]

- Rich

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:11 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Rince <rincebrain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Oh dear, I appear to have not built _DEBUG into this version of the
>> kernel. I'll go modify this and reboot into the new kernel.
>
> Can you at least do this:
>
>        cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes
>
> That way you can check that the 'fsc' status was percolated down to the
> submounts.
>
> David
>
> --
> Linux-cachefs mailing list
> Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
>



-- 

Presidency: The greased pig in the field game of American politics. --
Ambrose Bierce

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

[Linux Resources]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

Powered by Linux