|
|
|
Re: Kernel 2.6.30-rc2 | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
David Howells wrote:
What should I look for, I have my collectd module graphing /proc/*/stats out. But by comparing the graphs from a test with 2.6.30-rc2 to the 2.6.29-rc3 kernel there are huge differences between network and cpu. The 2.6.30-rc2 graphs with fscache and cachefilesd look identical to the 2.6.29-rc3 without fscache and cachefilesd.Edward Konetzko <konetzed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I have been testing fscache with kernel 2.6.29-rc3 and everything works as expected. I have been testing 2.6.30-rc2 and everything appeared to be working fine except when I look the resource graphs it seems like objects are not being retried from cachefilesd after they are cached on disk.Can you examine /proc/fs/fscache/stats? David -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
If you would like I might have time tomorrow to run the tests again and email you a pdf of the graphs.
Edward -- Linux-cachefs mailing list Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
[Linux Resources] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [Photo]