Re: How to handle a RAID5 arrawy with a failing drive? -> raid5 mostly works, just no rebuilds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think after the balance it was a fine, non-degraded RAID again... As
far as I remember.

Tobby


2014-03-20 1:46 GMT+01:00 Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:44:20AM +0100, Tobias Holst wrote:
> > I tried the RAID6 implementation of btrfs and I looks like I had the
> > same problem. Rebuild with "balance" worked but when a drive was
> > removed when mounted and then readded, the chaos began. I tried it a
> > few times. So when a drive fails (and this is just because of
> > connection lost or similar non severe problems), then it is necessary
> > to wipe the disc first before readding it, so btrfs will add it as a
> > new disk and not try to readd the old one.
>
> Good to know you got this too.
>
> Just to confirm: did you get it to rebuild, or once a drive is lost/gets
> behind, you're in degraded mode forever for those blocks?
>
> Or were you able to balance?
>
> Marc
> --
> "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
> Microsoft is to operating systems ....
>                                       .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
> Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux