Re: Feature request: true RAID-1 mode

[Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:35:30PM -0600, Marios Titas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yet another boot loader support request.
> >
> > Right now btrfs' definition of "RAID-1" with more than two devices is a
> > bit unorthodox: it stores on any two drives.  "True RAID-1" would
> > instead store N copies on each of N devices, the same way an actual
> > RAID-1 would operate with an arbitrary number of devices.
> >
> > This means that a bootloader can consider a single device in isolation:
> > if the firmware gives access only to a single device, it can be booted.
> >  Since /boot is usually a very small amount of data, this is a very
> > reasonable tradeoff.
> 
> +1
> 
> In fact, the current RAID-1 should not have been called RAID-1 at all,
> it is confusing.

With the raid5/6 code, I'm changing raid1 (and raid10) to have a
configurable number of copies.  So, you'll be able to have N copies on M
drives, where N <= M.

-chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html