Re: New btrfs-progs integration branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 06:18:00PM +0200, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, Hugo,
> 
> Du meintest am 06.06.12:
> 
> >> git checkout integration-20120605
> 
> [...]
> >    Can you compare your Makefile with the one at [1] -- in particular
> > the progs variable at line 21-23, the "all" target on line 37, and
> > the "btrfs-convert" target on line 97. There definitely should not be
> > a plain "convert" target in there, but that seems to be what your
> > system was failing on.
> 
> Makefile with 3888 Bytes.
> 
> "md5sum Makefile" shows
> 
> (my file)
> deef961e3ecd560ad8710cf0b58f5570  Makefile
> 
> (the file from your link)
> deef961e3ecd560ad8710cf0b58f5570  Makefile
> 
> The problem is somewhere on another place ...

   OK, can you send through the complete output of:

$ make clean
$ gcc --version
$ make --version
$ make
$ for f in .*.d; do echo == $d; cat $d; done

   My guess is that the dependency generation is going wrong somewhere.

   Hugo.

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
       --- There's many a slip 'twixt wicket-keeper and gully. ---       

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux