Re: Don't prevent removal of devices that break raid reqs
- Subject: Re: Don't prevent removal of devices that break raid reqs
- From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:10:24 -0200
- Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20111111022100.GD4435@shiny> (Chris Mason's message of "Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:21:00 -0500")
- Organization: Free thinker, not speaking for University of Campinas
- User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
On Nov 11, 2011, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:32:48PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> Instead of preventing the removal of devices that would render existing
>> raid10 or raid1 impossible, warn but go ahead with it; the rebalancing
>> code is smart enough to use different block group types.
> We'll need a --force or some kind. There are definitely cases users
> have wanted to do this but it is rarely a good idea ;)
Even if it's just metadata that will turn from raid1 to dup, as in the
revised patch below?
>From 276b1af70556bf5bdbaa1f81cb630d6c83962323 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandre Oliva <lxoliva@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:33:11 -0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Btrfs: enable removal of second disk with raid1 metadata
Enable removal of a second disk even if that requires conversion of
metadata from raid1 to dup, but not when data would lose replication.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index c37433d..7b348c2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1290,12 +1290,16 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path)
goto out;
}
- if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) &&
+ if ((root->fs_info->avail_data_alloc_bits & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) &&
root->fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices <= 2) {
printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: unable to go below two "
"devices on raid1\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
+ } else if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) &&
+ root->fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices <= 2) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: going below two devices "
+ "will switch metadata from raid1 to dup\n");
}
if (strcmp(device_path, "missing") == 0) {
--
1.7.4.4
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
[Linux NFS]
[Linux NILFS]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]