On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 10:43 -0400, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> Haven't had time to think this through, but if blktrace is sending
> binary data to blkparse, why not just replace blkparse w/ blkiomon?
> Taking data directly from blktrace itself?
Good point.
Still I think I want all the trace sorting blkparse does for me.
I didn't want to reimplement that functionality.
I don't need other capabilities of blkparse, though, like generating
some basic statistics.
Perhaps, it would make sense to move some blkparse code to a separate
c-file, which could be linked by other tools in the package, blkiomon?
Would be fine with me to make this all as light-weight as possible, e.g.
get rid of blkparse and a pipe.
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrace" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Netdev]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Memory]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]