On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 10:47 -0400, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> Hm, again, if the blktrace | blkiomon (direct, no blkparse) is how you
> do things,
no, it's blktrace | blkparse | blkiomon
Isn't blkparse needed to sort all those per-CPU traces by time?
I want this feature.
> I would think that it would /not/ take all that much
> processing power to parse character strings.
Anyway, it's more expensive.
> (I've heard that IBM makes some pretty fast processors... :-) )
Sure. But we don't make our money from wasting their CPU power :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrace" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Netdev]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Memory]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]