Re: bcache oops in bch_insert_data with the latest stables fixes (3.10.15)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mer. 09 oct. 2013 00:39:42 CEST, matthew patton a écrit :
> I'm confused as to what tree is actually safe to use. When these and
> like messages go out are all of the 3.10, 3.11, 3.12 etc trees
> updated to kill the bad code? There seems to be a lot of churn and as
> a user I'm not sure what code-base to grab that has the
> recent/obscure bugs fixed, and which are time-bombs.
> 
> Do all of the 3.10.x Linux kernel sources work with the bcache
> 3.10-stable git branch? Does 3.10-stable have *ALL* of the recent bug
> fixes included? If not, why not? Same for 3.11 and friends.
> 
> A little guidance please?

3.11.4 minus the patch I mentioned is fine in my experience; I've been
running it for a while along with other people (through the
bcache-for-3.11 branch).  I'm not sure what corruption that patch was
meant to prevent; I haven't encountered it as far as I know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux