Am Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:22:22 -0300
schrieb Marcel Bonnet <marcelbonnet@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi, there.
> What about these samples
> "License: You are free to use these samples as you wish, including
> releasing them as part of a commercial work. The only restriction is
> they must not be sold or made available 'as is' (i.e. as sampler or as
> a sampler instrument)."
> I'm just starting with them. I think any linuxsampler user probably
> knows, but what do you guys think of these samples? Does it meet the
> tech and license requirements? My first bad impression is about the
> sample format, they are all distributed as MP3 - I would consider a
> non compressed format instead.
the License means that you can't compile the samples in soundfont,
gigastudio, kontakt etc. file. I guess the intention of the license is
to prevent .sfz as well, although technically you could argue that the
samples are still "as is" in sfz format, there is only a meta file
added. But the same is true if you compress them and include metadata,
so the case could be made for any sampler format.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
[ALSA Users] [ALSA Devel] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Online Dating] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Video 4 Linux]