Re: klang

[Brett McCoy <idragosani@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Joe Hartley <jh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
> "Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on this one. After all
>> the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
>> over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
>> the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
>> courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
>
> I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management.
> My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
> have a heat problem.  I really couldn't care less about whether my audio
> subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I
> don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK.  My studio system
> has been very stable for years now.

AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to 'performance', you
shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much
stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to
make that much of an impact on it. :-)

-- 
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
    -- Jelaleddin Rumi
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user