Re: Muse beta?

[Dan MacDonald <allcoms@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Robert!

I've been following OOM with much interest although I've not got round to trying the latest svn version of Muse yet to see where its parent project is up to now in comparison - I will hopefully remedy that this weekend.

However, looking at the specs of Muse 2.0 there is one glaring omission - no support for LV2!? Will the final release support audio and MIDI plugins using the now stable LV2 spec or not?

Signed

FOSS plugin patrol UK

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Jonsson <spamatica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Brent,

2012/5/16 Brent Busby <brent@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Just wondering what those who use Muse sequencer think of the beta 2.x
> release versus 1.x for usability/stability...or would it be best to stick
> with 1.x for actually getting projects done for now?

Being a bit biased as I'm part of MusE's dev team I would say that the
beta, or even better, the latest svn is much better than 1.1.
As you may know I dabble a bit with Using MusE also and it works very
good for me.

Still, do tell us if you encounter any problem.

Regards,
Robert

>
> --
> + Brent A. Busby         +      "Some of them ate, some of them
> + Sr. UNIX Systems Admin +      laughed, and some of them picked
> + University of Chicago  +      up a nine gallon can of paint at
> + James Franck Institute +      Kmart for only $1.99."
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user