Re: [PATCH] ARM: two possible fixes for the KALLSYMS build problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:32:49PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:37:48PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:21:59AM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > David Brown (1):
> > >   ARM: Prevent KALLSYM size mismatch on ARM.
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/kernel/ |    3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Just wondering if anyone has had a chance to look at either of these,
> > or try them.  I haven't seen any KALLSYMS mismatch build errors with
> > either of these patches applied.
> I think variant 2 is the better approach out of either as it doesn't add
> to the size of the resulting kernel image.

The first variant doesn't ever increase the size of the kernel,
either.  Variant two actually makes it a little smaller, since a few
symbols are eliminated.

The second variant is cleaner, though as long as it is safe in every


Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]