Re: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@xxxxxx>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jamie Iles <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>, Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Arnd Bergman <arnd.bergmann@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data.
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 18:00:01 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20120501091334.GG15541@lunn.ch>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:13:34AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> I agree with you as well, it is frustrating. Could we agree, that once
> this patch is in, we freeze the core until the start of the next
> cycle. We use the remainder of this cycle for porting platforms to the
> generic clock framework.
Or merge the platforms then do framework changes incrementally, updating
the platforms as we go (which is the normal pattern for maintaining a
framework...). I see we've already got SPEAr merged.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[Linux for Sparc]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux MIPS]
[ECOS]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]