[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 06:38:30PM -0700, Michael Bohan wrote: > On 3/26/2012 6:00 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >Supplies are *always* specified using the name from the part data sheet, > >anything to do with regulator-regulator supplies is a Linux > >implementation detail. > So before filling out the supply_name when calling > regulator_register(), does that mean we should expect regulator > drivers that optionally support supplies to always check with > of_get_property()? And which name should we check? It sounds like I have no idea what this means, sorry. > the answer is that we should invent another binding to portray the > name of the supply the driver should be checking against. But then > it would seem silly to have two bindings that pertain to supply > names. Absolutely not, that would be broken. The whole point here is that supplies of all kinds are always requested with the name the chip uses for the supply.
Description: Digital signature